Skip to main content.

November 18th, 2006

The New World

The New World Movie Review

26 Votes | Average: 2.69 out of 526 Votes | Average: 2.69 out of 526 Votes | Average: 2.69 out of 526 Votes | Average: 2.69 out of 526 Votes | Average: 2.69 out of 5 (26 votes, average: 2.69 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading …

Rent Movie.com movie reviews presents The New World movie review a 2006 film starring Colin Farrell, Q’Orianka Kilcher and directed by Terrence Malick A Terrence Malick-scripted drama about explorer John Smith and the clash between Native Americans and English settlers in the 17th century. When 17th century explorer John Smith and a few men go up the river to trade with the Indians, he befriends the princess Pocahontas and they fall in love. While in love, Smith must obtain his duties as president of Jamestown fort and challenges to himself what is the better path for himself to take: stay with the fallen apart colony or go up the river and love Pocahontas in the wild. The Indians realize that the English do not mean to leave, so they attack. A few men at the fort decide to capture Pocahontas as a hostage so the Indians will not attack them. Smith is ordered to leave Jamestown by the King, and John Rolfe, a wealthy tobacco planter arrives at the fort. Pocahontas, now living there adapts to the English cultures and falls in love with Rolfe. She falls apart deciding who she is dedicated to, Smith or Rolfe. The legend of Pocahontas and John Smith receives a luminous and essential retelling by maverick filmmaker Terrence Malick. The facts of Virginia’s first white settlers, circa 1607, have been told for eons and fortified by Disney’s animated films: explorer Smith (Colin Farrell) and the Native American princess (newcomer Q’orianka Kilcher) bond when the two cultures meet, a flashpoint of curiosity and war lapping interchangeably at the shores of the new continent. Malick, who took a twenty year break between his second and third films (Days of Heaven and The Thin Red Line), is a master of film poetry; the film washes over you, with minimal dialogue (you see characters speak on camera for less than a quarter of the film). The rest of the words are a stream-of-consciousness narration–a technique Malick has used before but never to such degree, creating a movie you feel more than watch. The film’s beauty (shot in Virginia by Emmanuel Lubezki) and production design (by Jack Fisk) seems very organic, and in fact, organic is a great label for the movie as a whole, from the dreadful conditions of early Jamestown (it makes you wonder why Englishman would want to live there) to the luminescent love story. Malick is blessed with a cast that includes Wes Studi, August Schellenberg, Christopher Plummer, and Christian Bale (who, curiously, was also in the Disney production). Fourteen-year-old Kilcher, the soul of the film, is an amazing find, and Farrell, so often tagged as the next big thing, delivers his first exceptional performance since his stunning debut in Tigerland. James Horner provides a fine score, but is overshadowed by a Mozart concerto and a recurring prelude from Wagner’s Das Rheingold, a scrumptious weaving of horns fit to fuel the gentle intoxication of this film. Note: the film was initially 150 minutes, and then trimmed to 135 by Malick before the regular theatrical run. It was also the first film shot in 65mm since Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet. –Doug Thomas



Posted by admin in Adventure Movie, Drama Movie, Film Biography, History Movie, Romantic Movies

This entry was posted on Saturday, November 18th, 2006 at 2:40 pm and is filed under Adventure Movie, Drama Movie, Film Biography, History Movie, Romantic Movies. You can follow any responses to this entry through the comments RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Comments so far:

Comment by Pablohopp

# January 1, 2007,

Let me start my review by saying this; Q’Orianka Kilcher’s performance as Pocahontas is so utterly complete, that the scene when she first puts on an English dress and shoes was one of the most painful and heartbreaking things I ever witnessed in a movie. How often does a movie come along that can make something so simple, so powerful? That one scene says it all about the “New World,” but I won’t spoil the rest of the movie for you. People either love the movie or hate it. I can understand why it doesn’t appeal to some people. But how often do you read reviews so passionate for a film? For me personally, I’ve only been blown away by a movie three times in my life. First, when I was nine and seeing Star Wars for the first time. Whew, what a biggie! Fourteen years later I saw a showing of Lawrence of Arabia at an old local theater. I ended up going back three times. Now, 15 years later, it happened again. But unlike Star Wars and Lawrence, my viewing of The New World didn’t occur on the big screen, but on a flight. I read only one review of The New World before I saw it, and it wasn’t very good. But I love history and wanted to see the movie. Luckily the plane was showing it, but my viewing was limited by those tiny personal monitors and the audio had the usual hum of the plane engines. It made no difference. The opening scene, and what an amazing scene it is, drew me in immediately. In spite of the severe limitation to sight and sound, the power of the movie was shocking. I wasn’t expecting it at all. I was seeing and hearing things I had never seen or heard before in a movie. People often refer to their viewing as if “transcended,” and that’s an apt description. Upon arriving back to the USA, I immediately bought the DVD from Amazon to make sure that what I thought I saw was the real deal. It was again mind blowing, especially on a larger monitor and with surround sound. It’s one of those things that can’t be explained why some movies can hit you at those truly deep levels. I have read reviews of the movie, good and bad, and some people claim that those who don’t like the movie just don’t “get it.” Look, I didn’t like The Thin Red Line and loved Dumb and Dumber. I’m not so vain to think that I have something special about me to “get it” over other people. I think rather, it’s a matter of choice. We all have movies we like and dislike for various reasons. But if you didn’t like The New World, then I hope you can find some movie that will allow you to experience the sensation of being so truly moved that it demands repeated viewing. This movie had me questioning my views of history, life, love, right and wrong choices, and the way we live within our world and with each other. If you haven’t seen this movie, then give it a try. As you can read from the reviews, there is no middle ground; sure for some it as was boring, but maybe, just maybe, if you take a chance and sit back, it might just roll over you and then blow you away.

RSS feed for comments on this post.
TrackBack URI

Share your Movie Review

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


  |   The New World Forum

Enhance your movie critic image use Gravatar.com for your movie critic profile!

Shopping The New World Movie Products:
Buy The New World Dvd | Buy The New World Vhs | Buy The New World Download | Buy The New World Soundtrack | Buy The New World Game | Buy The New World Poster | Buy The New World Book | The New World Forum

Movie Review MomentsMovie Review Moments